Internet Archive, No Fair Use. Music in Political Campaigns.

Intro

In this month’s episode of the Entertainment Law Update Podcast, co-hosts Gordon Firemark and Tamera Bennett discuss key entertainment industry developments, including the 2nd Circuit Court ruling that Internet Archive's digital book publication is not fair use of copyright protected works; X's injunction against California  Assembly Bill AB 587 relating to social media disclosure requirements; and California's new AI regulations. They also cover: new protections for child influencers' earnings; a wrongful death case against TikTok challenging Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act; a revived copyright lawsuit on Queen Anne’s Revenge; Trump’s legal battles over campaign music; and T.I. and Tiny’s $71 million verdict involving the OMG Girlz dolls.

allowfullscreen>

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Corner Update:

California Governor Gavin Newsom signs three new laws related to generative AI and vetoed the AI safety bill SB 1047 citing concerns the "one-size-fits-all" approach of the bill was too broad. AB 1836, protects deceased individuals by requiring their estate's approval for AI recreations. And AB 2602 prevents contracts from allowing AI replicas to substitute for living performers without specific consent. SB 942 focuses on helping the public more reliably identify AI-generated content. It requires widely-used generative AI systems to include provenance disclosures in the content they generate.

Copyright Case Law Update:

The Internet Archive (IA) in Hachette Book Group, Inc. v. Internet Archive, 23-1260, (2d Cir. Sep 04, 2024) ECF No. 306 lost its appeal in the copyright case against Hachette and three other book publishers. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the previous decision, from March 2023, that the Internet Archive’s Open Library program qualifies as copyright infringement of works not in the public domain. 500,000 full works are to stay removed from public access through the Internet Archive.

Music In Political Campaigns Update

This election season mimics past cycles, as a flurry of demands and lawsuits are brought by songwriters, artists, and copyright owners against campaigns alleging copyright infringement for the use of songs or sound recordings. The Isaac Hayes family succeeded in obtaining an injunction to block the Donald Trump Campaign from using “Hold On, I’m Comin’.” The court did not require the removal of videos featuring the song from social media, which the Trump Campaign claims as a win. On the podcast, Tamera and Gordon go in-depth on changes made by public performance rights organizations, specifically ASCAP and BMI, allowing copyright holders to remove certain songs from blanket public performance licenses for political campaigns.

This and much more in this episode of Entertainment Law Update.



Listen & Subscribe           Stitcher  

Tamera H. Bennett

Tamera H. Bennett is a wife, mom, lawyer, mediator, blogger, podcaster, and legal writer. For two decades she’s helped clients protect what they create by practicing trademark, copyright and entertainment law in Texas and Tennessee.

Tamera has co-hosted more than 85 episodes of the Entertainment Law Update Podcast since 2009. And, she’s been honored to write for BILLBOARD magazine and the TEXAS LAWYER.

In the summer of 2015, Tamera backpacked 100 miles over 10 days with her son's Boy Scout Troop. Tamera walked her first half-marathon in 2012 and walked the Cowtown Half Marathon in February 2016 and February 2017 with a PR each time. You can visit Tamera’s blog at createprotect.com and follow her on Twitter @tamerabennett.

http://www.tbennettlaw.com
Next
Next

Copyright Grant termination Update; AI Corner is Busy